Love the design. Hybrid I think. Very posh and nice setup.

I like the layout of this one...sort of.

Absolutely, here are the key takeaways from the video Changing views - YouTube | Changing Views toward mRNA based Covid Vaccines in the Scientific Literature: 2020 - 2024 by Dr. John Campbell:

• [00:14] の変化 [へんげ] (change) Early scientific literature was biased in favor of promoting mRNA vaccines without any previous completed human clinical trials. This bias was likely due to social and political concerns, as well as corporate greed.

• [01:34] ⬆️ (increase) There has been a dramatic shift in the medical literature concerning mRNA vaccines between 2020 and 2024. Initially, the literature claimed there were no serious adverse events associated with mRNA vaccines. However, as more data became available, the literature began to acknowledge the existence of serious adverse events.

• [02:16] ⚠️ (warning) The early decision-making regarding mRNA vaccines was based on biased reports of the science. This led to the widespread use of mRNA vaccines despite the lack of safety data.

• [02:31] 🌐 (globe) Science should be completely objective when evaluating health risks. However, it can often be influenced by social and economic considerations.

• [03:27] 顕著 けんちょ The COVID-19 pandemic exposed serious vulnerabilities in Western medical research. These vulnerabilities include the susceptibility of science to bias and the influence of corporate greed.
  ░
  http://googleusercontent.com/youtube_content/0

• [04:23] (warning) The author argues that scientific principles were abandoned during the development and rollout of COVID-19 vaccines.

• [05:16] (increase) A review of over 4,000 scientific articles found an increasing acknowledgement of risks and reduced efficacy of mRNA vaccines between 2020 and 2024.

• [05:44] ➡️ (shift) There was a significant shift in scientific literature regarding mRNA vaccines. Early papers claimed no serious adverse events, while later papers acknowledged a significant number.

• [06:25] ⚠️ (warning) The author suggests early decision-making on COVID-19 vaccines was based on biased scientific reports that failed to acknowledge serious adverse events.

• [07:45] (corporation, money) The author claims the objectivity of scientific research on COVID-19 vaccines was compromised by social, political concerns, and overwhelming corporate greed.

• [08:11] ⚠️ (warning) The author warns that social, political concerns, and corporate greed can significantly bias scientific research, especially when evaluating health risks.

• [08:41] ⚖️ (balance) Scientific objectivity is crucial, but research can be influenced by social and economic factors.

• [09:40] (globe) The author suggests that international competition between superpowers like the US, Russia, and China influenced the development of COVID-19 vaccines.

• [10:08] (trophy) The author claims some countries prioritized being the "first" to develop a vaccine over safety and efficacy.

• [11:14] ❓ (question) The video raises the question of why the US heavily invested in mRNA vaccines when established vaccine technologies existed.

• [12:24] (money) The author suggests that economic considerations may have influenced the decision to prioritize mRNA vaccines over established alternatives.

• [13:19] (science tube) The video claims that national rivalries and corporate interests influenced scientific reporting on COVID-19 vaccines.

• [13:42] ➡️ (shift) There was a significant shift in scientific literature on COVID-19 vaccines between 2020 and 2024. Early papers claimed no serious adverse events, while later papers acknowledged a high rate.

• [14:23] ✅ (checkmark) Early scientific literature on COVID-19 vaccines often portrayed them as very safe and positive.

• [15:25] (minimize) Even when acknowledging some serious adverse events, later scientific literature downplayed their frequency with terms like "very rare."

• [17:41] ⚠️ (warning) The video cites a study that found a significant increase in reports of serious adverse events associated with mRNA vaccines.

• [18:10] (increase) The author claims there has been a dramatic shift in the medical literature regarding mRNA vaccines, with a later acknowledgement of serious adverse events.

• [18:43] (money) The author suggests the early positive portrayal of mRNA vaccines in scientific literature may have been influenced by monetary and political purposes.

• [19:29] (conflict) The video criticizes the practice of vaccine producers publishing research promoting their own products, citing conflicts of interest.

• [20:28] (newspaper) The video suggests that even prestigious medical journals may not be immune to bias.

• [20:46] (ban) The video mentions the existence of arguments for completely banning mRNA vaccines until further safety testing is conducted.

• [21:12] (lock) The video calls for more transparency in data regarding mRNA vaccines.

• [21:28] (bomb) The video concludes that the shift in attitudes towards mRNA vaccines exposes serious vulnerabilities in Western medical research.

Wallowa

Really good point. Dreams are tools, and the moment they become a problem, discard them. The Purpose or Point is to solve problems for yourself and others. Period. Reduce misery, create joy.
[00:00] Introduction: False Summits and Reaching Goals

• John introduces the concept of a false summit through the metaphor of mountain climbing.
  • Reaching a seemingly high point can be misleading, revealing a longer climb ahead.
  • This metaphor sets the stage for the video's discussion about goals and their outcomes.

[00:00] Introduction: False Summits and Reaching Goals
John introduces the concept of a false summit through the metaphor of mountain climbing.
Reaching a seemingly high point can be misleading, revealing a longer climb ahead.
This metaphor sets the stage for the video's discussion about goals and their outcomes.
[00:28] John's Weirdest Day: A Story of Unexpected Turns
John shares a personal story about a day filled with contrasting experiences.
He describes achieving a professional dream job offer.
This is juxtaposed with a chance encounter with a former girlfriend.
The narrative foreshadows the idea of plans changing and goals taking unexpected turns.
[02:06] Rethinking Dreams and Success
John argues that focusing solely on achieving pre-set dreams can be problematic.
Dreams may not lead to fulfillment and achieving them might not answer the question "what's the point?".
He introduces the concept of solving problems as a new perspective on success.
Solving problems, big or small, provides a sense of purpose and addresses concrete needs.
This is contrasted with the idea of chasing dreams that may not be directly connected to our current needs or well-being.
[03:58] The Problems with Solutions and Social Media
John acknowledges the potential downsides of solutions.
He expresses concern that his online work might create problems alongside the benefits it offers.
Social media algorithms are identified as a specific problem.
He emphasizes the manipulative nature of these algorithms and their negative impact on users' focus and time.
[04:11] John's Focus on Problem-Solving
John describes his current mission to find solutions to problems.
He prioritizes solutions that benefit both himself and others.
The Book of Good Times is introduced as a solution-oriented project.
This project aims to combat the issue of people being pulled away from self-engagement by social media and technology.

Pre-bunking as opposed to debunking. Very interesting. Inoculating the audience to the lie so they won't believe it.

• 03:14 Crowns are meant to strengthen weak teeth, but if enough tooth structure remains, they might not be necessary.
  • 03:56 Placing a crown requires removing significant tooth structure, including enamel, the tooth's protective layer.
  • 04:09 ⚠️ Removing enamel can increase tooth sensitivity and make it more prone to dying.
  • 04:37 🩹 Crowns ideally bond to enamel, but removing it weakens the crown-tooth connection.
  • 05:04 漏 A weak crown-tooth bond can cause leaks and lead to new cavities under the crown.
  • 05:17 [invalid URL removed] domino According to the video, root canals and crowns often lead to a cycle of further treatment and eventual tooth loss.
• 06:38 A sensitive tooth might be "affected" but not infected, and treatable with alternative methods.
  • 06:52 ☠️ An infected tooth with dead nerve and bacteria growth is best removed to prevent further issues.
  • 07:57 Exposing the nerve tissue during a procedure can lead to the tooth dying.
  • 08:24 Ozone treatment can kill bacteria in a cavity without harming the nerve.
  • 08:52 ✅ If a cavity is treated without exposing the nerve, the tooth can potentially heal itself.
  • 09:20 ✨ Tooth sensitivity can be a good sign, indicating a living tooth treatable with alternative methods to root canals.
• 09:48 According to the video, in many cases (around 95%&t=588), dentists can treat cavities and save the tooth without needing a root canal.
  • 10:03 Many root canals (60-80%&t=603) might be avoidable if the tooth is affected but not infected.
  • 10:15 If enough tooth structure remains after a cavity is treated, a crown might not be necessary.
  • 10:43 Onlays are a more conservative alternative to crowns, preserving more tooth structure.
  • 11:10 ️ Preserving tooth enamel is important for long-term tooth health.
  • 11:40 Biomimetic dentistry aims to preserve natural tooth structure and intervene before tooth loss is inevitable.
  • 11:54 ✅ Biomimetic dentistry offers potential long-term benefits like preserving natural teeth.
  • 11:59 To find a dentist who practices biomimetic dentistry, ask if they offer treatments like ozone therapy and onlays.