About 10% people have mRNA in blood after 28 days. F*ck!!!

Good evidence (from one autopsy) that mRNA vaccine caused brain and heart damage that could not have been caused by contracting covid virus -- damaged brain and heart tissues contain ONLY spike protein (which is in vaccine and covid) but no nucleocapsid protein (which only the virus produces). I.E., if this damage was caused by virus, it would contain both molecules, not just spike protein.

Also see: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651

Cases and hospitalization for covid is down in U.K. but excess deaths are up. So we speculate the excess deaths are NOT from covid.

So I guess what's unsaid is: These excess deaths are occurring in areas where mRNA vaccines were prevalent, and it's worth investigating if the vaccine is the cause.

[Fascinating that this was removed by YouTube, as it cites scientific paper]

The more vaccinations a person received, the more likely they contracted covid.

Warrants more investigation. We need to compare the populations that had different number of vaccinations. One obvious question: are those with more vaccinations more likely to be exposed to covid and that explains the difference.

Does not negate that early on, vaccines DID protect from infections. But things have changed, at least it looks more complex currently.

Video of support for John Campbell. Slam of health authorities of U.K. and U.S.

1 in 800 adverse events from mRNA vaccine. Other vaccines were pulled for a few as 1 in 100,000 adverse events.

Includes video of Pfizer rep admitting they did not test to see if the vaccine reduced transmission. Yet policies requiring vaccination were put in place. Kinda strange.

Vaccine didn't make a difference to chances of having long-term covid symptom...Wow.

"we did not observe evidence of qualitatively different symptom clustering in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated individuals,
with either alpha or delta variants. "

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab707/6353927

Mpg2022
I'm a cancer and reconstructive surgeon. The nature of my subspecialty means that I have a better working knowledge of muscle anatomy than just about any other physician or surgeon outside my subspecialty. In the deltoid, the large veins are only found on the deep aspect of the muscle where the blood supply enters the muscle (ie: the neurovascular hilum). The large vessels arborise very quickly into much, much smaller and finer branches such that nearer the muscle surface (the area where most IM injection needles would get to), there are few if any veins of sufficient size that cannulation could occur leading to an inadvertant intravenous injection. This risk is reduced further if the site is pinched during needle entry (collapses the blood vessels).

That said, I have never understood why present day training seems to advise against aspiration prior to intramuscular injection in both medical and nursing courses. Perhaps I am a bit of a dinosaur (graduated medical school in 1995), so I still do it the traditional way. I know full well that the likelihood of inadvertant IV injection with the short, fine needles (as used with Covid-19 and flu vaccination) is practically zero. However, it does no harm to aspirate, seems entirely logical and sensible; and is hardly a huge extra task in the process. I have seen enough freak events happen over my many years of work that I rather not take any chances. I also do not understand the seeming active resistance that some medical and nursing practitioners have when asked by patients to aspirate prior to IM injection. There's no need to be difficult for something so simple and if it affords the patient a measure of reassurance, surely we should just do so rather than be a**hats about it.

Sorry for my rather long post.